29.8.07

You Can Call Me “Little Miss Schadenfreude”


While watching the YouTube clip of Miss Teen South Carolina, Lauren Caitlin Upton, deliver a completely nonsensical, incoherent response to why 1/5 of Americans cannot find the United States on a map, I was overcome with two feelings that have been immortalized by 80s rap duo Rob Base and DJ EZ Rock: joy and pain.

I felt the pain first. Even though the Miss Teen USA pageant is hardly a Nielsen’s juggernaut, there are at least a few million Americans that tune in every year, not including the audience, the other contestants, and a panel full of D-list denizens whose acting credits as Bloody Corpse #2 on CSI qualifies them to pick America’s next teen sweetheart. I challenge anyone to stand on that stage and not be nervous with that many pairs of eyeballs watching you, waiting for you to screw up.

Though, Ms. Upton’s answer was less a screw up and more like projectile word vomit, sprinkled with a dash of poor education and topped off with a light dusting of delusion. She should have just kept it real. Kept the words simple. Certain people possess the natural (or learned) skill of elocution. Others do not. And that’s okay. Not everyone can be articulate, and those that are not, especially those whose lives revolve around pageantry, should know to work with what their mamas gave (or neglected to give) them.

Had she decided to work her down-home girl persona and said, “Y’all, I think that is such a shame. We need to get some more learnin’ up in y’all’s schoolhouses,” she would have a much better score from the judges and saved herself the immense embarrassment and YouTube infamy. But, instead, she tried to be someone else. She tried to affect an air of intelligence, as evident in her references to “the Iraq,” “South Africa,” and her flagrant use of the phrase “such as.” It was as if she watched old news reportage tapes of Christiane Amanpour but reenacted by Britney Spears after taking a Quaalude. Perhaps she thought just tossing out these non-sequiturs and sound bites from adult conversation would be enough to impress the crowd and judges. You can’t blame her for thinking it would work; hell, our president does it at every single press conference he attends. And he’s the president.

And when she completed her answer, you could hear the utter shock in Mario Lopez’s voice when saying, “Thank you, Miss South Carolina.” When you’ve made AC Slater silently condemn you as a fucking moron, then you know you need to shuffle around your priorities a bit. Perhaps fewer Cardio Striptease classes and more time in an actual classroom?

After watching the clip, my pain slowly subsided and was soon replaced by sinister, bitchy joy. Not that I have anything against Miss Upton. I’m sure she’s a nice young woman who was probably forced into this profession at the age of five by an obese mother with a permanent wave and a dream deferred. I was happy because Miss Teen South Carolina, though unwittingly, became an exemplar of sexist culture gone terribly, terribly awry.

The concept of beauty pageants is horrifying in and of itself, a backward, spray-tanned, Aquanet idea of what makes a woman successful and worthy of adoration. According to the Miss Teen USA pageant and the rest of its ilk, a woman needs to look good in a dress, look good in a bathing suit, walk in heels, smile wide, perform a choreographed dance routine, and answer a question in order to be placed on a pedestal high above her fellow females. I think they may have even eliminated the talent portion of some of these pageants, meaning you don’t even have to be able to tap dance or twirl a baton anymore in order to win a crown. You just have to be hot and form sentences, at the very most two or three full phrases: 1) “I’m ________ and I’m from the great state of _________!” and 2) “If I could change the world, I’d adopt every baby alive so that they’d all be American because this is the greatest country on earth! I support our troops!” Add that to a big rack and even bigger hair, and bam: crown and title.

And this is what we teach our young women. We teach them that if you’re pretty and smile a lot, you’ll have the world at your fingertips. You don’t need to contribute significantly to the workforce, you don’t have to be smart, and you needn’t be original, provocative, or groundbreaking in any way. It’s like a training facility for future trophy wives. These contestants field banal questions from judges whilst smiling in a bedazzled evening gown, just as they will in five years when their first husbands introduce them to their dirty old man business colleagues at a cocktail party.

And just as Miss Teen South Carolina should have kept it real, pageants should as well. PR teams shouldn’t try to spin pageants into celebrations of intelligence, poise, ambition, and scholarship. The last time I checked, the women finalists for Fulbright scholarships were not asked to strut in bikinis and 3-inch heels for the judging committee. But who knows? I was never eligible to become a Fulbright scholar; perhaps their criteria do involve a swimwear component of some sort and I’ve just been misinformed. Though, I did hear somewhere that Rhodes scholars have to perform flawless “jazz hands” before they can even step foot onto Oxford’s campus. And for good reason.

Pageants are contests based on looks and likeability, both relying on extremely standard expectations of aesthetics and personality. And if they billed themselves as that, I think they’d find themselves less frequently being the butt of jokes in this nation. And if they decided to distinguish themselves from other more healthy forms of competition amongst women (academic, artistic, entrepreneurial, et cetera), then maybe more young females would be aware that there are other means of excelling in our society, many of which do not require parading around like a bronzed show poodle.

So my glee doesn’t come from Ms. Upton’s humiliation, but rather from the fact that so many people watched her YouTube clip and afterwards, shook their heads in disbelief (when they weren’t crying from laughter or cringing with embarrassment). This gives me hope that people realize how pertinent the brain is, and then even a cute, fit blonde needs a little something going on upstairs.

I don’t worry about Ms. Upton. She’ll still have men lining up around the block with marriage proposals and an eagerness to impregnate her. She may even have a lucrative career as a local anchorwoman or as one of the entertainment correspondents on the TV Guide Channel. More importantly, she should proud that she has compromised a bit of her dignity in order to open the eyes of this country, and quite possibly the world. She was the sacrificial lamb whose slaughtering may have just sparked a revolution, mobilizing young, motivated women of substance to make their voices heard. Bless her heart, bless her stupidity, and God bless America.


Posted by: Sylvie - inzino staff

Feigned Incompetence


The headlines were screaming with the news that Alberto Gonzales was stepping down from the position of Attorney General. Political reaction wasn’t as mixed as one would have expected. The common thread seemed to be that Gonzales was ineffective at handling his own department. Certainly his responses before the Senate warranted that observation.

But this is, of course, a trademark of the Bush administration: feigned incompetence. We are expected to believe that persons this high up in our government have absolutely no clue what they are doing, sitting in a boat with no one knowing how to row the oars. Gonzales repeated this mantra so many times during his time before the Senate Judiciary Committee that one could mistake him for doing a religious invocation. Regardless of the question, he could not recall dates or meetings and what they entailed.

It is certainly public knowledge that these recent years have been the most secretive in decades for the White House, cloaking decision-making behind a wall of classification and secret tribunals. For this reason, it makes absolutely no sense that incompetency is at work here.

One must ask themselves about a man in a powerful position who would assert to the Senate judiciary Committee on January 18 of this year that the Constitution does not expressly grant the right of habeus corpus. Ponder further the leaked memos from Gonzales attempting to invalidate the Geneva Conventions and international law in finding legal justifications for torture. Or the fact of his connections with warrant-less domestic wiretapping that supposedly caused a late night visit to an ailing Ashcroft back in 2004.

Another curious little aspect is that the Senate Judiciary Committee issued subpoenas back in June regarding the wiretapping program, which in turn has caused the White House to stonewall in releasing documents all summer. The extension on those subpoenas ran out on Aug. 20 and the information could have implicated Gonzales of wrongdoing. Furthermore, Committee chairman Patrick Leahy sent a letter to Inspector General Fine asking for an investigation into possibly misleading statements Gonzales made before the Committee on July 24, 2007.

Not surprisingly, Gonzales takes a bow and exits the stage at this time. The White House deflects further criticism by pointing the finger at our journalist for ousting him with the negative portrayal. The media frenzy surrounding his replacement will quiet the additional rumblings of the scandals.

That leaves us only with the impression of a befuddled Gonzales in our memory banks, testifying with an uncomfortable smile as he faces the cameras as he says, “I don’t know, can’t recall, can’t remember the exact details, it is certainly possible but I was not privy to the details…”

But this image doesn’t fit the smooth calibration of a how a year’s worth of investigations will float dead in the water while our man smoothly rows away on a boat provided by unseen benefactors.

Gonzales didn’t get to where he is by being an inept man. This is true for every member of this administration. So why are we convincing ourselves of this merely because it is easier to swallow?


Posted by: Rhonda - inzino staff

28.8.07

Technical Difficulties


The DSL at my apartment is on the fritz and subsequently, my roommate now has a death wish out on att&t: imagine Charles Bronson, but in the body of a little Vietnamese gal. I'm sure we've all imagined that at some point in our lives. I know I have.

I kind of like the lack of internet access. It definitely makes me more productive. Well, except at work, when i'm catching up on all the blogging, shoe browsing, Facebook'ing and Youtube'ing that i was unable to do at home. But that is besides the point.

Yesterday evening when the Internet crapped out, I decided to make dinner on the stove as opposed to in the microwave. I sat and watched the news. I read a few Tobias Wolff short stories. Then I went to a gym on Stanford campus. I did more beneficial things for my brain and body in one evening than I've done in this entire month of august, I'm sure.

The downside? (because there's always a downside...) I left my Ipod in one of the treadmills in Arrillaga. I stuck it in the water bottle holder because I can't run without the ear buds fallling out so i usually just go without music. I got a nice 1/4 mile run in (in my defense, I had just spent 35 minutes on an elliptical; I'm not a complete lard-ass) and then I just peaced out. By the time I got home and noticed it was missing, the gym was already closed. I called this morning, but they did not have an Ipod that fit my description.

The Ipod itself is not the issue. I've had that thing since 2004 and it's scratched the hell up. Despite working well, the battery life sucked. The ear buds were always problematic and funny enough, ended up being the reason I am Ipod-less at the moment.

But, do you know what really devastates me?

I'm afraid that someone will out me as corny-ass music fan.

I love great, quality music. My inner hipster loves that I own mp3's of artists singing in languages that i don't know, erudite underground rappers, manic-depressive singer-songwriters, and 60s soul singers.

But sometimes life is a little too stressful or precarious. And sometimes you need a quick hit of musical crack that offers nothing more than a beat to step to or simple, catchy-ass melody.
Posted by: Sylvie - inzino staff

27.8.07

The Tolerable Enemy

A half-crushed bottle lying on the pavement. The morose worker waving away the voter registration volunteers. Dimished response to community activism. A passionate shrug among friends as they discuss current events.

What do these have in common? The answer is apathy.

It is a tolerable enemy in America these days, creeping along side us as we go about our daily lives. Outside my door is a city full of people whose opinions are just as passionate as my own.

Yet for some reason, this passion doesn’t transform itself into action. Perhaps it is because that our culture demands change happen immediately. Like fairy tales we believed as children, we cling to notions that simple slogans will solve our policy crises and weather whatever storms we may face.

We have been very wrong.

Our world is full of partisan politics. The lines are drawan in the sand on any given issue. However, the one thing that is the same is the fact that people are overwhelmed by the sheer enormity of the problems.

Take health care of example. No one can honestly argue that our system is as good as it can be. There is a monstrous amount of bloated costs to go along with our harried system of medical beauracy that is strangled doctors as much as patients. Regardless of political affliation, the sheer number of uninsured Americans in this country is a travesty. One need look no further than a neighbor to find a story of a loved one who died not because medical care was unavaible, but because they could no longer afford it.

And so we stand at a crossroads where everyone points fingers at everyone else year after year while doing absolutely nothing to solve the problem. Our voting populace shrugs and says, “So what else is new?” And those that have managed to attain good health care at the moment, despite all the passionate talks, have not hargued local, state or federal jurisdictions into making effective policy changes.

I walk out everyday into a world where I hear conversations about the state of our country. And no matter how eloquent the points made or embittered the person saying them, it all ends with a shrug and matter that nothing can be done about it.

With apathy by our side, this is certainly true. It carried the unspoken mantra that everything has gone to rot anyway. So why care?

I’ll tell you why: because it is our responsibility as human beings. It is not enough to carve out a niche in society for yourself. Our people are isolated now because our communities have broken down and with them, the support systems that carried these thoughts into action.

It is all too easy to sit back enjoying our iPhones and forgetting about the issues that face all of us on any given day. It shouldn’t take a catastrophy to bring us together as a nation to agree that change is necessary. It should instead be a part of the goal of each of us to build on the foundations of our past to light our way into the future.

As it stands now, our future is blisteringly dark. When every news channel can be more concerned with the actions of Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan than reporting on the ailing financial status of our citizens, our media has failed us. When we don’t hold our leaders accountable to fulfilling the promises they made to win our votes and our confidence, when we tell ourselves that we are not affected by the actions made in our name, then we have surely failed ourselves.

Because our nation wasn’t founded by people who didn’t think or were afraid of fighting for what they believed in. Perhaps you and I will disagree on the political scene. Perhaps not. But I think all of us would respect each other a lot more if we all gave it a try instead of tolerating the boredom that has seeped into every facet of our society.

And let’s face it: we are pretty bored. The Statisical Abstract of the United States for 2007 predicts that the average American will spend 3,518 hours plugged into some type of media, whether its form is a book, the internet, radio or television. That is nearly five months worth of time, yet the common complaint is “there isn’t enough time in the day.”

Techology makes folks isolated.

Posted by: Rhonda - inzino staff

26.8.07

Your balls offend me, Infidel


A demonstration has been held in south- east Afghanistan accusing US troops of insulting Islam after they distributed footballs bearing the name of Allah.The balls showed the Saudi Arabian flag which features the Koranic declaration of faith. Methinks the Mullahs are little testy because this hearts & minds stuff actually works. These Afghan kids, living the closest to normal as they ever have, going to school, getting candy bars and soccer balls from the Americans, are less likely to sit around listening to Uncle Ahmed tell the story (for the zillionth) of how he lost his eye fighting the Infidel swine in the mountains. No, they will be outside playing like kids are supposed to, instead of learning how to wire themselves with explosives and hate Jews just because they're Jews. And that, ladies, gentlemen and Jihadis, is how America is going to win the war.I'll bet you ten Yankee greenbacks that they'll even manage to win over old Uncle Ahmed, by giving him a new eye...
Posted by: Wendy - inzino staff

How the Record Company Killed Music


The 50's, 60's, 70's, 80's and 90's...each can lay claim to a very distinctive style of music, so distinctive in fact, that if a young person uttered "Oh, that's so eighties!" we would know exactly what they were talking about.Yet, here we are nearing the year 2010, and much of today's music is very similar to the stuff that was released the decade before it?How did that happen?Let us reflect, for a moment, on the current music industry. Is it forward thinking? Willing to embrace change? Reveling in creativity and/or new, inspired, voices?Hardly.This is an industry that sued kids for downloading music, when they should have rushed to understand mp3 technology, adopt it, and use it to their advantage, a move that would have made them money, and kept the general populace happy with them.After alienating their customer base, they tried to blame mp3 downloading for lackluster sales, failing to realize that it was their own inability to accept change, coupled with the penchant for releasing music that would only appeal to twelve year olds who knew no better, that had left a permanent bad taste in the mouths of consumers.Today, the industry is still clueless, ignoring the shouts of people who are asking for a valid alternative to the norm (not watered down versions of what is already out there, thinly disguised as something "new"…)In the old days, it used to be "let's find the next best thing!" Record execs were always on the prowl for something different, yet with a marketable appeal. They understood that something unique had a greater chance for longevity, which was their goal. They yearned for anything that would catch on and become the new gold standard.In other words, they were willing to take risks, and because of it, we have been privy to some of the greatest music in history.In today's time however, the Beatles would be tossed over in favor of Britney Spears, despite the potential ability to reap huge rewards with such a band.Modern labels want instant gratification, seeking to find the next (insert chart topping band name here), in an effort to reap the lucrative, if fleeting rewards, of sound recognition. This is in spite of an overwhelming majority of Americans confessing to being fed up with the crap we are currently getting via the radio airwaves.Also, while yes, the bottom line is important, companies can write off acts that don't do well, and the small percentage of acts who sell millions make up for the few bombs here and there.The ability to take risks is available, should they deign to grasp it.I am firmly of the opinion that the next Elvis, Michael Jackson, or Aretha Franklin is out there, but he/she is being tossed aside in favor of a disposable, blue eyed pop singer.Also, I think musicians and consumers alike are somewhat to blame for the fact that we are living in a recycled music era.Music decades were hallmarked by a shift in mood; the 60's embraced flower power, free love and an end to war, the seventies gave us an emotional release with disco and well as political commentary, the eighties spawned punk, new wave glam rock and synth driven pop -- the nineties got tired of the cotton candy of the eighties and called itself alternative…It was a direct response to the times. The people wanted music to reflect it's current mindset, and tossed aside anything that didn't meet the emotional and political expectations of that period in history.Yet, here we stand, accepting that which is unacceptable, letting record companies spoon-feed us crap that has no substance but is based purely on image.I recall a conversation I'd had with the President of a New York based record label, who gave me glowing praise for my work, but told me, "The music industry was ten percent talent ninety percent image." He asked me to get back to him when I had found stylist.Have I found my image? Not sure. My concentration has centered more on my musical voice – what I have to say and why. I am hoping that, in time, I will catch up with my musical reflection just as the industry is ready to accept it. In the interim, music's natural evolution is being suppressed, and in the end, an entire decade will suffer.

Posted by: Alicia - Inzino Staff

D'ua


I should be cleaning, doing something other than just sitting here at this formidable box, absorbing reckless piles of information that often leave me useless for the remainder of the day. I soak up endless newssites and blogs and cyberatic junkmail that is lying scattered around, in between the bills and periodicals of my internet post office.. The other day I found Du'a. she shook me to my core. To the point of unwavering sadness. It was the same day that 17 year old Jordin won American Idol that I dredged up this overlooked story. It was all around the same day. but it went so deep that I could not write, should not have spoken and had no reply. Du'a. The 17 year old girl who was stoned to death in Iraq for loving the wrong boy. he was not from her sect. His religion was different.. She was dragged from her home and publicly stoned to death. Yes... rocks.... usually pieces of cinderblock thrown at her little head until she was still bleeding but no longer moving. no longer screaming. no longer crying. No longer holding the image of the boy she could not love because he did not come from her religious sect. A group of men, throwing rocks and kicking her in the ribs. I would doubt it's reality but in our sickened age of readily available information someone filmed it on their phone. It is everywhere. She loved the wrong boy. Who didn't at seventeen. Du'a is dead. Killed brutally at 17 for having passion to go after her heart. beyond tradition. beyond the rules. she was able to see that boy as another human. and for that she is dead.don't know about Du'a you shouldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Du’a_Khalil_Aswad
Posted by: Ellyn Parker - inzino staff

23.8.07

I've Got Spirit Yes I Do... I've Got Spirit... How About You?


Uh...no! Definitely not. In an attempt to save some coin, I made the mistake of booking my ticket on Spirit. I figured my last horrible experience with them was a long seven years ago and in that time, they must have hired better staff, upgraded their airlines and generally made the Spirit traveling experience a more enjoyable one. How wrong I was. The trouble started upon arrival at LAX. The surly and disinterested clerk barely glanced at me, didn't ask for ID and then informed me that it was $10 to check my bags. "You're kidding right?" The look on his face told me that no he wasn't kidding and he has probably never kidded in all his years at Spirit airlines. So because I'd wanted to travel light, I had decided to check my duffel and I was carrying two bags. Twenty dollars to check my bags. It's not the money that matters but the principle. If you have to pay for bags, it defeats the purpose of a cheaper ticket. But what's a girl to do? I grudgingly paid for the bags and then Mr. Friendly proceeded to let me walk towards the security without telling me that I needed to take my bags to those new screening checkpoints. Upon noticing that all my fellow travelers were waiting in a different line, I turned back just in time to hear him tell the bag man, "These are abandoned bags. Don't know where she went." I waved frantically and got his charming grimace in response.But it gets worse. We were delayed for 45 minutes and not a single announcement was made. I couldn't even see a crew member for the airline. Maybe they were all back in the back loading luggage. Got to keep those costs low. So I waited and read and waited. Finally we boarded and after takeoff, my seatmate and I wanted drinks. Turns out they charge for that too. Not alcoholic drinks folks (though after this flight I needed to drink heavily) but sodas, juice, coffee or tea. Definitely another black mark against Spirit.But the final straw was as I tried to make my return to LA. I arrived at La Guardia yesterday for my 3pm flight. It was raining and miserable outside so of course the lovely staff members of Spirit were in great moods. I handed my ID to the attendant and he informed me that I would make my first connection to Detroit but that I wouldn't make it to LAX that evening. I shrugged, thinking, "One more evening can't hurt.""That's okay. I'll just get a flight out tomorrow." He punched some buttons and then grunted and in his Spirit robot voice said, "The earliest I can get you out if Thursday, around 1pm." TWO DAYS! Not even the next evening, they simply said, "Sorry. We're overbooked. I was stunned. What kind of airline says sorry, it'll be another two days before you can leave. The anger and surprise left me shocked and dazed. I realized I hadn't even kicked up a fuss. I didn't ask for vouchers or hotel money. I just turned around and slunk off back to twin sisters. Of course time in NYC is never a bad thing especially seeing Twin Sis but I wanted/needed to get back for work. Getting paid after a week's vacation is always nice. Plus it's been almost a month since I've slept in my own bed, used my shower or devoured my TIVO. Basically I miss my home. I tried calling Spirit to complain and got outsourced God knows where. He listened to me vent for 10 minutes (after 20 minutes of holding) and then conveniently we got disconnected. More of that fantastic Spirit airlines service. So tomorrow morning I head back to La Guardia and...sigh...Spirit. Here's hoping that they prove me wrong and show me that they aren't nearly as competent as they seem.
Posted by: Hollie - Inzino Staff

21.8.07

Terrorist?


It's early and I can't fall back of asleep.. I should get up and run but instead I read 8 newspapers online ad bitch about politics on my school posts... I can't believe that the "mastermind" behind the 9/11 attacks confesses in Gitmo and it barely makes the news...Oh, I am sure his confession was extracted in an oh so Jack Bauer like way... but I am puzzled still as how something that devasted our country would get such little attention.. Oh that's right the mass contolled media is run by the goverment and there is NO freedom of press anymore.. And he's british Born.. (Muslim yes) but not from Iraq, Iran Afghanistan or any of the other oil rich countires that we pin all the terrorists on. American government officials are the real terrorists.. They keep us pinned to the grindstone.. and our stupid tvs... working..slaving to pay taxes so they can fight their wars...hogwash really.
Posted by: Ellyn - Inzino Staff

Blog Archive